Date Log
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Level of Maturity Regional Innovation System as an Effort Improving Public Services
Corresponding Author(s) : Bachtari Alam Hidayat
Proceedings Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta Undergraduate Conference,
Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): Crafting Innovation for Global Benefit
Abstract
Regional innovation system is related to the entire process of developing innovation between government institutions, research institutions, business entities, and the community that prioritizes science, technology, and the development of new methods. The purpose of this research is to identify and analyze the types and groups as well as the maturity of regional innovations in the city of Palembang and include them in the regional innovation map. The data collection method used was interview with relevant stakeholders, such as government officials, academics, and practitioners involved in the development of regional innovations and public services. Observation, which is a method of collecting data by making direct observations on regional innovation systems and public services in a number of selected regions. Questionnaire, which is a method of collecting data using questionnaires filled out by a number of related respondents, such as government employees and communities involved in or receiving public services in the area studied. The results of this study show that the regional innovation development roadmap for the city of Palembang until 2019 has totaled 126 innovations issued by the regional organization (OPD), but there are still many programs that are at the initiation stage so efforts are needed to develop infrastructure, human resources, regional funding to policies capable of making innovations run sustainable. Efforts to accelerate the implementation of governance reforms in the regions need to be encouraged through innovation programs for all regional government administration affairs. Therefore, the development and implementation of innovation in the regions is not only limited to the internal bureaucracy, but also must be encouraged to the private sector and the community which is expected to increase regional competitiveness.
Keywords
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX
- Alzahrani, N. A., Sheikh Abdullah, S. N. H., Mohamed, I., & Mukred, M. (2021). The Adoption of Geographic Information Systems in the Public Sector of Saudi Arabia: A Conceptual Model. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1099256
- Anthony, B. (2023). The Role of Community Engagement in Urban Innovation Towards the Co-Creation of Smart Sustainable Cities. In Journal of the Knowledge Economy (Issue 1). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01176-1
- Bilberg, A., Radziwon, A., & Bogers, M. (2017). Creating and capturing value in a regional innovation ecosystem: a study of how manufacturing SMEs develop collaborative solutions. International Journal of Technology Management, 75(1/2/3/4), 73. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2017.10006145
- Bleeker, A. (2019). Strengthening ICT and knowledge management capacity in support of the sustainable development of multi-island Caribbean SIDS. CEPAL - Serie Estudios y Perspectivas, 0, 5–61. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/45064/S1901146_en.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
- Cooke, P. (1997). Regional innovations systems: Institutionsl and organizational Dimensions. Research Policy, 26, 475–491. https://doi.org/10.5260/chara.23.1.9
- Cooke, P., & Memedovic, O. (2006). Regional Innovation Systems as Public Goods. UNIDO Policy Papers, January 2006, 36.
- Ejemeyovwi, J. O., Osabuohien, E. S., Bowale, E. K., O Abuh, O., Adedoyin, J. P., & Ayanda, B. (2019). Information and Communication Technology Adoption and Innovation for Sustainable Entrepreneurship. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1378(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1378/2/022085
- Global Innovation Index. (2020). Global Innovation Index 2020 - Indonesia 85th. Gii 2020, 9.
- Haryanto, D. (2021). Analisis Tingkat Kematangan Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi Menggunakan Kerangka Kerja COBIT5. Jupiter, 13(2), 33–44.
- ITU. (2017). Bridging The Digital Innovation Divide: A toolkit for strengthening ICT centric ecosystems.
- Jiang, L. (2022). Research on the Connotation and Implementation Path of Innovation-Driven Development Strategy. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 12(02), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2022.122010
- Kusharsanto, Z. S., Maninggar, N., Suhandojo, Maulidya, D., & Muzaki, A. R. (2021). How infrastructure contributes to fostering Regional Innovation System: The case of Pelalawan Regency - Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 778(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/778/1/012001
- OECD. (2017). Embracing innovation in Goverment: Global trends. In Shaping Future Goverments (Issue February, p. 128). trends.oecd-opsi.org
- Özdemir, S. (2017). Teacher Views on Barriers to the Integration of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in Turkish Teaching. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 12(3), 505–521. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2017.1244p
- Payong, Y. (2020). Evaluation of the Maturity Level of IT Governance for Public Information Services and Public COBIT 4.0. Jurnal Inovasi Kebijakan, V (2), 35–54. http://www.jurnalinovkebijakan.com/
- Pereira, G. V., Macadar, M. A., Luciano, E. M., & Testa, M. G. (2017). Delivering public value through open government data initiatives in a Smart City context. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(2), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9673-7
- Putra, E. Y., Nelson Lombone, H., Dolosha Purba, H., Gosal, M. C., Indriani, S., & Sitepu, B. (2020). Measuring The Maturity Level of Public Service Cerdas Command Center (C3) Using COBIT 5.0 at The PEMKOT MANADO. Cogito Smart Journal, 6(2), 298–309.
- Ratriyani, R. C., & Roychansyah, M. S. (2022). Assessing Smart City Maturity of Banyuwangi Regency Using SNI ISO 37122 Indicators. Jurnal Sinar Manajemen, 09(02), 278–285.
- Robaczewska, J., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Lorenz, A. (2019). Applying open innovation strategies in the context of a regional innovation ecosystem: The case of Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Global Transitions, 1, 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2019.05.001
- Samara, E., Andronikidis, A., Komninos, N., Bakouros, Y., & Katsoras, E. (2022). The Role of Digital Technologies for Regional Development: a System Dynamics Analysis. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-00951-w
- Santos, D. A. G. dos, Zen, A., & Bittencourt, B. A. (2022). From governance to choreography: coordination of innovation ecosystems. Innovation and Management Review, 19(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-08-2020-0117
References
Alzahrani, N. A., Sheikh Abdullah, S. N. H., Mohamed, I., & Mukred, M. (2021). The Adoption of Geographic Information Systems in the Public Sector of Saudi Arabia: A Conceptual Model. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1099256
Anthony, B. (2023). The Role of Community Engagement in Urban Innovation Towards the Co-Creation of Smart Sustainable Cities. In Journal of the Knowledge Economy (Issue 1). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01176-1
Bilberg, A., Radziwon, A., & Bogers, M. (2017). Creating and capturing value in a regional innovation ecosystem: a study of how manufacturing SMEs develop collaborative solutions. International Journal of Technology Management, 75(1/2/3/4), 73. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2017.10006145
Bleeker, A. (2019). Strengthening ICT and knowledge management capacity in support of the sustainable development of multi-island Caribbean SIDS. CEPAL - Serie Estudios y Perspectivas, 0, 5–61. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/45064/S1901146_en.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Cooke, P. (1997). Regional innovations systems: Institutionsl and organizational Dimensions. Research Policy, 26, 475–491. https://doi.org/10.5260/chara.23.1.9
Cooke, P., & Memedovic, O. (2006). Regional Innovation Systems as Public Goods. UNIDO Policy Papers, January 2006, 36.
Ejemeyovwi, J. O., Osabuohien, E. S., Bowale, E. K., O Abuh, O., Adedoyin, J. P., & Ayanda, B. (2019). Information and Communication Technology Adoption and Innovation for Sustainable Entrepreneurship. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1378(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1378/2/022085
Global Innovation Index. (2020). Global Innovation Index 2020 - Indonesia 85th. Gii 2020, 9.
Haryanto, D. (2021). Analisis Tingkat Kematangan Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi Menggunakan Kerangka Kerja COBIT5. Jupiter, 13(2), 33–44.
ITU. (2017). Bridging The Digital Innovation Divide: A toolkit for strengthening ICT centric ecosystems.
Jiang, L. (2022). Research on the Connotation and Implementation Path of Innovation-Driven Development Strategy. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 12(02), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2022.122010
Kusharsanto, Z. S., Maninggar, N., Suhandojo, Maulidya, D., & Muzaki, A. R. (2021). How infrastructure contributes to fostering Regional Innovation System: The case of Pelalawan Regency - Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 778(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/778/1/012001
OECD. (2017). Embracing innovation in Goverment: Global trends. In Shaping Future Goverments (Issue February, p. 128). trends.oecd-opsi.org
Özdemir, S. (2017). Teacher Views on Barriers to the Integration of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in Turkish Teaching. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 12(3), 505–521. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2017.1244p
Payong, Y. (2020). Evaluation of the Maturity Level of IT Governance for Public Information Services and Public COBIT 4.0. Jurnal Inovasi Kebijakan, V (2), 35–54. http://www.jurnalinovkebijakan.com/
Pereira, G. V., Macadar, M. A., Luciano, E. M., & Testa, M. G. (2017). Delivering public value through open government data initiatives in a Smart City context. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(2), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9673-7
Putra, E. Y., Nelson Lombone, H., Dolosha Purba, H., Gosal, M. C., Indriani, S., & Sitepu, B. (2020). Measuring The Maturity Level of Public Service Cerdas Command Center (C3) Using COBIT 5.0 at The PEMKOT MANADO. Cogito Smart Journal, 6(2), 298–309.
Ratriyani, R. C., & Roychansyah, M. S. (2022). Assessing Smart City Maturity of Banyuwangi Regency Using SNI ISO 37122 Indicators. Jurnal Sinar Manajemen, 09(02), 278–285.
Robaczewska, J., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Lorenz, A. (2019). Applying open innovation strategies in the context of a regional innovation ecosystem: The case of Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Global Transitions, 1, 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2019.05.001
Samara, E., Andronikidis, A., Komninos, N., Bakouros, Y., & Katsoras, E. (2022). The Role of Digital Technologies for Regional Development: a System Dynamics Analysis. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-00951-w
Santos, D. A. G. dos, Zen, A., & Bittencourt, B. A. (2022). From governance to choreography: coordination of innovation ecosystems. Innovation and Management Review, 19(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-08-2020-0117